Manual Action Recovery Service in Canada: Fight Back

Manual action recovery service in Canada for site owners: we fix the issues, document the work and request a Google review.

Featured at

  • Forbes
  • HubSpot
  • Entrepreneur
  • GoDaddy
  • Zapier
  • Whatagraph
  • Yahoo Finance
  • Toronto Star Readers’ Choice 2022 Diamond Winner
  • Toronto Star Readers’ Choice
  • DashThis
The full system

4 channels. 1 team. More ways to win calls.

Manual action

We address Google's notice and strengthen your SEO foundation for the pages your other channels use.

Google Ads

Paid search brings visitors to your pages while its search-term data informs SEO and conversion work.

Conversion

We improve enquiry paths so visitors from SEO and Ads have a clearer route to calling you.

AI search

Clear service details support AI-search visibility and give visitors from SEO and Ads a clearer message.

Get A Free Audit

Move faster

Manual action recovery service in Canada: 5 fast moves

01Hour 1

Get eyes on the notice

We check what Google flagged and where your site took the hit.

02Hour 12

Find technical trouble

QUIQ Pixel finds technical SEO issues in hours, not weeks.

03Day 2

Put fixes in motion

Our AI tools and scripts accelerate repairs while other agencies book a kickoff.

04Day 7

Build your evidence

We record the changes so Google can see the work behind your request.

05When ready

Ask Google to review

Once the issues are addressed, we prepare and submit your reconsideration request.

Case study

10 → 36 monthly organic leads in 12 months

Toronto criminal defence firm Shikhman Barristers: 160 paid links removed, 980 remaining links disavowed and 1 action withdrawn.

Penalty recoverySEOCriminal defence law firmToronto, ON12 months
Shikhman Barristers
crimlawcanada.ca · Sep 2024 vs Sep 2025
10→36Organic leads / monthDeduplicated forms + calls; same month year over year

Removed 160 paid links, disavowed 980 remaining links and secured withdrawal of 1 manual action. Organic leads rose from 10 to 36 monthly.

Sanctions / manual actionToxic linksCannibalisationIndex bloatLink cleanupContent rebuildCrawl & index cleanupInternal linkingAuthority links
Organic leads / month2024–2025 year before
012233547Oct ’24NovDecJan ’25FebMarAprMayJunJulAugSep ’2512343610
  • 1980-link disavow accepted
  • 21 reconsideration request
  • 31 manual action revoked
  • 460 organic leads
Organic leads / month10 → 36+260%
Organic sessions / month400 → 1,600+300%
Keywords in top 108 → 29+262%
Indexed service pages12 → 48+300%
Organic session-to-lead rate2.5% → 2.2%-12%
Editorial referring domains10 → 50+400%
  • 1 sitewide unnatural-inbound-links manual action remained unresolved.
  • 1,240 inbound links; 1,140 flagged for removal or disavowal.
  • 12 of 48 service pages indexed; staging canonicals blocked consolidation.
  • 400 monthly organic sessions generated 10 deduplicated enquiries.
  • 96 thin archive URLs competed with 48 service pages.
Disavow upload rejected without saving

Spreadsheet export used UTF-16; regenerated 980 link entries as UTF-8 and verified acceptance in Search Console.

980 entries initially rejected
Reviewer could not open removal evidence

Drive permissions restricted the evidence sheet; published a redacted, viewable copy documenting 160 removals before submission.

160 removals lacked accessible evidence
Service pages canonicalised to staging

WordPress migration retained staging canonicals; replaced 48 canonical targets and purged cached HTML before requesting recrawls.

36 service pages unindexed
Oct ’241240inbound links audited; 100 retained, 1,140 flagged
Oct–Nov ’24160paid links removed; publisher replies and screenshots logged
Nov ’24980remaining toxic links disavowed; accepted file archived
Dec ’2412 → 48service pages rebuilt; canonicals corrected; 96 archive URLs noindexed
Jan ’251reconsideration request submitted with removal evidence and acquisition-policy changes
Feb ’251manual action revoked; Search Console confirmation archived
Mar–May ’25120contextual internal links added across charge and court guidance
Jun–Sep ’2540editorial referring domains earned through cited legal explainers; no paid placements
Downtown TorontoOntario Court of Justice courthouse at 10 Armoury Street

1 court guide distinguishes Ontario Court appearances from Superior Court proceedings

University AvenueSuperior Court of Justice criminal courthouse at 361 University Avenue

1 criminal-court guide supplies the address and links to official court information

EtobicokeToronto South Detention Centre at 160 Horner Avenue

1 custody-enquiry page separates detention facilities from court locations

ScarboroughToronto East Detention Centre at 55 Civic Road

1 family-enquiry guide links to provincial visiting information

Want the same breakdown for your site? It starts with a free audit.

Get A Free Audit
Market data

69% of clicks lost. Who got your calls?

QliqQliq's Search Console data shows a 69% aggregate organic click loss across 90 affected sites. Get your free audit.

15%
of referred sites had a confirmed manual action

90 of 600 sites; confirmed in GSC, not inferred from traffic losses

QliqQliq audits + GSC of client sites
69%
aggregate organic click loss across 90 affected sites

180,000 to 55,800 clicks across equal 28-day windows before and after detection; association, not causal attribution

GSC of client sites
$7,200
median remediation fee across 60 resolved cases

CAD; excludes GST/HST, lost revenue and ongoing SEO

QliqQliq project records
42 days
median time from remediation start to action removal

60 resolved cases; 30 cases remained open at the reporting cutoff

QliqQliq case logs + GSC of client sites
Site segmentSites auditedConfirmed actionsAction rateMedian click lossMedian resolution daysMedian remediation fee
E-commerce1802715%72%45$8,400
Local services1402115%68%35$5,400
Affiliate publishing1001818%76%56$9,600
Professional services801215%63%38$6,600
News and media60813.3%70%49$10,800
SaaS and B2B40410%58%30$4,800

600 audits; 90 confirmed actions. Click loss: equal 28-day windows around detection. Resolution days and fees cover 60 resolved cases only: 18/14/12/8/5/3 by row. Rates rounded to 1 decimal where needed. Source: QliqQliq audit records, project records, GSC of client sites

Affected sitesUnaffected client sites
Position 112.4%
Position 28.1%
Position 35.7%
Position 44.2%
Position 53.1%
Position 62.4%
Position 71.9%
Position 81.5%
Position 91.2%
Position 101.0%

90 affected versus 120 unaffected sites; 28-day reporting windows. Includes recorded impressions only; deindexed URLs are absent. Query mix and SERP features differ; not a causal penalty estimate. Source: GSC of client sites + QliqQliq SERP capture, 200 queries

Audit reviews and confirmed manual actions by city
Toronto140
Montréal110
Vancouver95
Calgary90
Ottawa70
Edmonton55
Winnipeg40

First number: site audits; second: sites with GSC-confirmed manual actions. Totals: 600 audits and 90 actions. Cities reflect business headquarters, not searcher locations. Source: QliqQliq audit records + GSC of client sites

15%

had a GSC-confirmed manual action

QliqQliq audits, 600 sites
45%

had technical indexing problems as the primary finding

QliqQliq audits, 600 sites
25%

had suspected algorithmic or content-related declines as the primary finding

QliqQliq audits, 600 sites
15%

had other primary findings, including demand shifts and tracking errors

QliqQliq audits, 600 sites
100%

of 90 manual-action cases were verified in the GSC report

GSC of client sites
36

sites had unnatural inbound links as the primary action

GSC of client sites, 90 cases
24

sites had thin content with little or no added value

GSC of client sites, 90 cases
12

sites had pure spam as the primary action

GSC of client sites, 90 cases
10

sites had structured data issues as the primary action

GSC of client sites, 90 cases
8

sites had site reputation abuse as the primary action

GSC of client sites, 90 cases
60/90

cases had confirmed action removal by the reporting cutoff

QliqQliq case logs + GSC of client sites
33.3%

of confirmed cases remained open at the reporting cutoff

QliqQliq case logs, 30 of 90 cases
42 days

median remediation-to-removal time across 60 resolved cases

QliqQliq case logs
2

median reconsideration requests across 60 resolved cases

QliqQliq submission logs
$7,200

median remediation fee across 60 resolved cases, excluding GST/HST

QliqQliq project records
180,000

organic clicks across 90 affected sites in the 28 days before detection

GSC of client sites
55,800

organic clicks across the same 90 sites in the 28 days after detection

GSC of client sites
69%

aggregate click decline across the paired 28-day windows

GSC of client sites
1,200

organic leads before detection across 18 sites with CRM attribution

QliqQliq CRM exports + call tracking
372

organic leads after detection across those 18 sites; down 69%

QliqQliq CRM exports + call tracking

Method: 600 referred sites audited · 90 GSC-confirmed manual actions · 60 resolved cases · 200 SERPs captured · 28-day click comparisons; referral sample, not national prevalence · Updated Q3 2026

Built for speed

4 tools. Fewer weeks watching the phone.

QUIQ Pixel

Find technical problems in hours

Our QUIQ Pixel checks your site for technical SEO problems fast, giving the team a head start on repairs.

Scripts

Get fixes out the door

Our tested in-house scripts speed up the work of shipping fixes and pages. You get action instead of another meeting.

AI tools

Move from plan to page

Our team uses AI tools to speed up page and fix delivery. You don't need to learn the tech; we focus on leads and calls.

Glass Box

See the work, day or night

The Glass Box Portal tracks rankings, leads, spend and change logs 24/7. No more paying an agency and wondering what happened.

Get A Free Audit

Who does the work

1 team. Your calls come first.

Founder Anton Kovalchuk, social media head Lena, a CMO, developers, and SEO and PPC specialists work as one team. We take just one major client in each niche and region. You get a focus on leads, not jargon.

Toronto office, 123 Edward StSEO, PPC, dev in one team

Meet the team on a free audit

Anton Kovalchuk, Founder
Anton KovalchukFounder
Lena, Head of social media
LenaHead of social media
QliqQliq office in Toronto

Get the facts. Then get moving.

What does a manual action recovery service in Canada do?

We investigate your Google Search Console notice, address the identified issues, document the changes and submit a reconsideration request. The free audit starts the conversation.

How do I know whether I have a manual action?

Open Google Search Console's Manual Actions report. Traffic loss alone doesn't confirm one; search updates or site issues may also cause a decline.

When can removal happen?

QliqQliq's logs plus Search Console data from clients show a 42-day median from starting remediation until removal. The issues, your market, necessary work and Google's review affect your timeline.

What does remediation cost?

QliqQliq project records show a $7,200 median fee across 60 resolved cases. Your quote depends on the work your site needs. Start with a free audit.

Will my rankings return once the action is removed?

There is no ranking guarantee. Google determines whether the action is withdrawn; removal doesn't ensure traffic will recover right away. We track visibility and leads as the work progresses.

What happened for Shikhman Barristers?

After the link cleanup, Google withdrew one manual action. In 12 months, monthly organic leads climbed from 10 to 36; monthly organic sessions increased from 400 to 1,600.

Explore related services

Anton KovalchukWritten and reviewed by Anton Kovalchuk, Founder of QliqQliq · Updated November 2026

Your competitor's van is already in the driveway.

Find out what's holding your site back. Get your free manual action audit.

Google Premier Partner · top 3%5.0 from 100+ reviewsOne client per niche
Get Your Free Audit